我
- A.many teachers are opposedto the idea of being evaluated by the students
- B.students are opposed tothe idea of evaluating the teachers on their own
- C.students fear that theyare likely to be criticized by their teachers if they are to give theirassessments
- D.many teachers fear that theyare likely to criticize the students who have given their assessments
- A.how well they give theirlectures
- B.how well they get alongwith the students
- C.how many papers and booksthey have published
- D.how well they conducttheir academic researches
- A.Students’likes andinterests are the standards of evaluation of a teacher's lecturing．
- B.Students are actuallycapable of judging the class accomplishments of lectures．
- C.Students are academicallycapable of making comments on the skills of teaching．
- D.Students are not to giveassessments of a teacher's lecturing．
- Anyonewho has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers variesgreatly．A feware very effective communicators，conveying thesubstance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students towant to know more about the subjec
- It could．of course，be argued thatstudents are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures．If anyone should evaluate lecturers，itshould be their colleagues. However．I am not arguingthat students should be asked to comment on the academic con
- I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fearsome lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students．However，lecturers should see such e-valuation as an opportunity to becomeaware ofDefects in their lecturing t
- According to the author，all the students know that________.
- A.it is tooDull to attendlectures
- B.quite a lot of teacherscan produce the results studentsDesire
- C.they must be inspired tolearn
- D.there are greatDifferencesamong the lecturers as to their quality of teaching
