英语科技文选自考2008年7月真题及答案解析

如果您发现本试卷没有包含本套题的全部小题,请尝试在页面顶部本站内搜索框搜索相关题目,一般都能找到。
3

It is clear that the findings of Dr. Arpad Pusztai __________.

  • A.come in conflict with the government’s GE food policies
  • B.provide strong support for Derek Burke’s argument
  • C.justify the suppression of the different voices concerning GE food
  • D.resolve the genetic engineering debate once for all
4

According to the passage, the goal of college education should be to develop instudents the ability to __________.

  • A.find commercial applications for scientific research
  • B.set up informed goals before doing any scientific research
  • C.think critically and independently about how research is applied
  • D.adapt readily to the scientific development in the commercial sector
5

What can be said about what happened to Arpad Pusztai?

  • A.The public is ignorant of the potential risks in GE food.
  • B.TV plays an important role in publicizing scientific research.
  • C.Independent science is faced with threat.
  • D.Scientific findings are important to scientific research.
6

                                                              (B)

       The scientific establishment is playing a key role in research and development of genetic engineering biotechnology and in actively defending the industry under the banner of “sound science” and “scientific progress”. Scientific advice to the government is heavily biased in favor of the industry. Lord Sainsbury, current Minister for Science, was formerly chairman of the Sainsbury family’s supermarket chain, closely involved with the development of GE foods. Another prominent scientist, Derek Burke, advisor to the Parliamentary Committee on Science and Technology and formerly chairman of the Advisory Committee on Novel Food Products, was a key participant in the UK Government’s Technology Foresight exercise, and in a follow-up group that determined the pro-biotech funding policy of the BBSRC. Derek Burke is an outspoken and staunch defender of the industry. The public are being informed uncritically by scientists like Burke and others, consciously or unconsciously serving commercial interests, and legitimate concerns about safety are caricatured as irrational fear arising out of ignorance.

        The credibility of science and scientists has been steadily diminishing over the years as science has become more and more absorbed into the commercial sector. Science education at every level is being subverted to corporate aims: its chief purpose is to provide skilled but uncritical workers for industry. The UK Government has even run a competition for science students on how to commercially exploit scientific research. There has been no major open debate on genetic engineering within academic institutions, that has been organized by the academic staff. With very few exceptions, students are not encouraged to ask questions about the ethics or the hazards of genetic engineering on either side of the Atlantic.

        Scientific evidence of actual and potential hazards, which has been steadily building up over the past ten years, is being ignored and dismissed. More seriously, independent scientists reporting findings damaging to the industry are gagged and victimized. Within the UK, Dr. Arpad Pusztai, senior scientist of the publicly-funded Rowett Institute, and his collaborators were awarded a 1.6 million pound grant to carry out systematic safety testing of GE food. They found that the GE potato lines tested were toxic to young rats, and Pusztai informed the public in a brief interview which was part of a TV documentary. A few days later, he was removed from his job, denied access to his data, and forbidden to speak on the subject.

      The suppression of scientific findings is nothing new; it has been happening more and more within the past decade. Since the 1970s, scientific fraud has been increasing, as has the proportion of peer-reviewed scientific papers retracted. We have moved far away form the traditional ideals of science as science loses innocence and independence.

What is the author’s attitude toward the role the scientific establishment is playing?

  • A.Critical.
  • B.Approving.
  • C.Tolerant.
  • D.Apprehensive.
7

What can be inferred from the first paragraph?

  • A.BBSRC is not in favor of GE biotechnology.
  • B.Lord Sainsbury is a well-known scientist himself.
  • C.Most supermarkets in Britain sell GE foods.
  • D.Burke is not aware of public ignorance about GE foods.
8

What probably remains unchanged as the ape infant grows?

  • A.When it is carried, it clings to its mother’s stomach.
  • B.It is carried on its mother’s back.
  • C.It has to learn to stand on two legs.
  • D.When it is carried, it holds tightly its mother’s body hairs.
9

All of the following could account for bipedality EXCEPT _______.

  • A.safe carrying of heavy infants
  • B.the fall in body hair
  • C.the weight of the infant
  • D.the weight of the adult
10

Which of the following is NOT true according to the passage?

  • A.Primates must be two-footed so as to safely carry their heavy infants.
  • B.Ape evolution to humans is somewhat attributed to the need to stand on two legs.
  • C.Group cooperation among biped species was probably due to the fact thefemales carrying their infants in arms had difficulty in food gathering.
  • D.It seems the male apes seldom carry their babies.
12

                                                               (A)

        The transition from apes to humans may have been partially triggered by the need to stand on two legs, in order to safely carry heavier babies. This theory of species evolution presented by Lia Amaral from the University of S?o Paulo in Brazil has just been published.

        For safety, all nonhuman primates carry their young clinging to their fur from birth, and species survival depends on it. The carrying pattern changes as the infant grows. Newborns are carried clinging to their mother’s stomach, often with additional support. Months later, infants are carried over the adult body usually on the mother’s back, and this carrying pattern lasts for years in apes. However, this necessity to carry infants safely imposes limits on the weight of the infants.

       Through a detailed mechanical analysis of how different types of apes-gibbons, orangutans and gorillas-carry their young, looking at the properties of ape hair, infant grip, adult hair density and carrying position, Amaral demonstrates a relationship between infant weight, hair friction and body angle which ensures ape infants are carried safely.

  • Amaral also shows how the usual pattern of primate carrying heavy infants is incompatible with bipedalism. African apes have to persist with knuckle-walking on all fours, or “quadruped” position, in order to stop their young from slipping off their backs.
  • Amaral concludes that this evolution to bipedality has important consequences for the female of the species. Indeed, it frees the arms and hands of males and juveniles, but females have their arms and hands occupied with their young. This restriction of m
  • A.The transition from apes to humans.
  • B.Bipedality and safe carrying of heavy infants.
  • C.The ape infant carrying pattern.
  • D.The theory of species evolution.
13

According to Amaral, what is responsible for safe ape infant carrying?

  • A.Infant weight.
  • B.Adult weight.
  • C.The biped form of movement.
  • D.Infant hair density.