外刊经贸知识选读2018年4月真题试题及答案解析(00096)

如果您发现本试卷没有包含本套题的全部小题,请尝试在页面顶部本站内搜索框搜索相关题目,一般都能找到。
28

Passage 2

Globalization: Who Benefits from It?

We should be asking if the USA is harmed by globalization. If so, how can it be remedied?Although international trade itself is generally beneficial to participating nations, a trade deficit is always economically detrimental to the nation’s economy. The USA’s trade deficit of goods has been annually increasing for over a half century. There’s no reason to believe it will not continue to do so as we continue to seek pure free trade.For over a half century the USA’s continuously increasing annual trade deficits of goods have been such a significant catalyst. Our annual GDP and median wages (平均工资)have been less than otherwise due to our pursuit of pure unrestricted free trade.A trade deficit’s detriment(损害) to the GDP greatly exceeds the amount of the deficit itself. This is its multiplier effect. Any harm to the GDP affects the median wage. If the US Congress determines we practice global charity, it should be funded by all US tax payers rather than its greater proportionate burden upon lower wage and salary earning families.In 2003 Warren Buffett’s concept to significantly decrease the USA’s trade deficit of goods was published.The self-funding proposal is market rather than government driven and requires no constitutional amendment. It will increase rather than decrease the USA’s aggregate sum of imports plus exports. We can enjoy cheap imports and a greater purchasing power brought about by higher median wages.

The USA’s trade deficit of goods has been annually rising for over a century.

33

(Unstable) crude prices prompted falls in platinum and gold.

  • A.steady
  • B.unsuitable
  • C.unbearable
  • D.unsteady
35

Passage 1

On GATT—WTO

Conclusions of the Uruguay Round are truly a triumph in adversity. Securing agreement among so many countries on such a complex raft of trade agreements frequently seemed an insuperable challenge in the past year. To have done it at a time of sluggish growth, political uncertainty and protectionist pressures is an extraordinary achievement.Whatever the shortcoming of the result, the original vision of a broad expansion of International trade law is now much closer to fulfillment. More remarkably still so is the dream that drove the founding fathers of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade: that of a liberal, rules-based international trading system overseen by an authoritative world trade organization. Just as the GATT helped foster economic integration and growth in the postwar decades, the new agreement should provide powerful underpinning for the world economy, fresh impetus to competition, fresh hope for those developing and former communist countries that have been opening up to international commerce.Several individuals deserve credit. Mr. Peter Sutherland and before him Mr. Arthur Dunkel, GATT directors-general, worked tirelessly to cajole recalcitrants—especially the US and EU一 into setting differences. Mr. Mickey Kantor, US trade representative, has dispelled the most serious doubts about his and the administration’s commitment to multilateral free trade. Sir Leo Brittan, the European trade commissioner, played a difficult hand with consummate skill and by luring France into the fold, arguably saved the Union from a political crisis of alarming proportions.

It was not difficult for the member countries of the GATT to reach an agreement on trade.

39

Government (procurement) of recycled paper stimulates recycling.

  • A.spending
  • B.purchasing
  • C.supporting
  • D.propaganda
44

American industry was (booming) by the autumn of 1942.

  • A.flourishing
  • B.diminishing
  • C.decreasing
  • D.changing