单选

Passage Three

When she returned home after a year in South America, Judith Martin, a North American writer, began to have a problem. People kept interpreting her behavior as flirtatious, but she was not flirting. Fairly soon she figured out what was happening.

When most South Americans talk to each other face-to-face, they stand closer together than do North Americans. Martin had not readjusted to North American distances. Apparently, she had forgotten about the phenomenon known as personal space — the amount of physical distance people expect during social interaction. Everyone has expectations concerning the use of personal space, but accepted distances for that space are determined by each person’s culture.

Observations about personal space began about twenty years ago. Anthropologist Edward T. Hall was a pioneer in the field. He became very interested in how interpersonal distances affected communication between people. In his book The Hidden Dimension, Hall coined the word “proxemics” to describe people’s use of space as a means of communication. As Hall’s book title indicates, most people are unaware that interpersonal distances exist and contribute to people’s reactions to one another.Personal space depends on invisible boundaries. Those boundaries move with people as they interact.

Personal space gets larger or smaller depending on the circumstances of the social interaction at any moment. People do not like anyone to trespass on their personal space. As Worchel and Cooper explain, invasions of personal space elicit negative reactions that range from mild discomfort to retaliation to walking out on the situation.

Researchers working with Hall’s data found that accepted interpersonal distances in the United States also depend on other factors. For example, subcultures help determine expectations concerning personal space. Fisher, Bell, and Baum report that groups of Hispanic-Americans generally interact more closely within their subculture than Anglo-Americans do within theirs. They further explain that in general subcultural groups tend to interact at closer distances with members of their own subculture than with nonmembers.

  • Age also affects how people use personal space. Worchel and Cooper report that North American children seem unaware of boundaries for personal space until the age of four or five. As the children get older they become more aware of standards for personal
  • Gender also influences people’s use of personal space. For example, North American males’ most negative reaction is reserved for anyone who enters their personal space directly in front of them. Females, on the other hand, feel most negative about approac
  • As international travel and commerce increase, intercultural contact is becoming commonplace. Soon, perhaps, cultural variations in expectations for personal space will be as familiar to everyone as are cultural variations in food and dress. Until then, p
  • Judith Martin’s experience tells that interpersonal distance in social interaction is determined by ______.
  • A.personal preference
  • B.cultural background
  • C.location
  • D.race
参考答案
您可能感兴趣的试题

It was a great shock to me to discover that I had motor neuron disease. (46. I had never been very well co-coordinated physically as a child. I was not good at ball games, and my handwriting was the despair of my teachers.) But things seemed to change when I went to Oxford, at the age of 17. (47.I took up coxing and rowing. I was not boat race standard, but I got by at the level of inter-college competition.)

In my third year at Oxford, however, I noticed that I seemed to be getting clumsier, and I fell over once or twice for no apparent reason. But it was not until I was at Cambridge, in the following year, that my father noticed, and took me to the family doctor. He referred me to a specialist, and shortly after my 21st birthday, I went into hospital for tests.

The realization that I had an incurable disease, that was likely to kill me in a few years, was a bit of a shock. (48. How could something like that happen to me? Why should I be cut off like this? Not knowing what was going to happen to me, or how rapidly the disease would progress, I was at a loose end.) The doctors told me to go back to Cambridge and carry on with the research I had just started in general relativity and cosmology.But I was not making much progress, because I didn’t have much mathematical background. And, anyway, I might not live long enough to finish my Phd. I felt somewhat of a tragic character.

But shortly after I came out of hospital, I dreamt that I was going to be executed. (49. I suddenly realized that there were a lot of worthwhile things I could do if I were reprieved. In fact, although there was a cloud hanging over my future, I found, to my surprise, that I was enjoying life in the present more than before.) I began to make progress with my research, and I got engaged to a girl called Jane Wilde, whom I had met just about the time my condition was diagnosed. That engagement changed my life. It gave me something to live for. But it also meant that I had to get a job if we were to get married. I therefore applied for a research fellowship at Gonville and Caius College, Cambridge. To my great surprise, I got a fellowship, and we got married a few months later.

The fellowship at Caius took care of my immediate employment problem. (50. I was lucky to have chosen to work in theoretical physics, because that was one of the few areas in which my condition would not be a serious handicap.) And I was fortunate that my scientific reputation increased, at the same time that my disability got worse. This meant that people were prepared to offer me a sequence of positions in which I only had to do research without having to lecture.

¥

订单号:

遇到问题请联系在线客服

订单号:

遇到问题请联系在线客服