Do you think that it is necessary to draw a distinction between acquisition and learning? Why or why not?

From the historical development of foreign language teaching in China, what is the main method used in each period?

Do you think that it is necessary to draw a distinction between acquisition and learning? Why or why not?

What do you think the three methods( the Silent Way, Community Language Learning and Suggestopaedia) have in common?

What are the textbooks like in the Oral Approach?

Is the Communicative Approach a useful one for all proficiency levels, particularly for beginners?

What are the roles of the learner in the Communicative Approach?

What are the main features of traditional linguistics?

Could you adapt any of techniques of Audiolingual approach to your own teaching? Whywhy not?

Column A: different methods used in China

①Three Dimensional Approach

② Global Method

③ Leveled Method

④ The ASSRF Method

⑤Dual Aetivity Method

Column B: one of the main features

a. To teach a language and to educate people is one of the six dualities.

b. One of the five aspects of language teaching is the affective factors.

c.It takes a text-based, top-down approach.

d. Students study at different level

e. A foreign language is learned, and what is acquired plays only a subsidiary role.

According to Piaget, thought or thinking has its origin in actions physically performed and then( )， In other words, thought is actions.